Summary
Introduction
Proudhon
criticized for a new perspective
Social,
Bakunin propositions
The second organization
anarchist Peter Kropotkin
Conclusion
References
Summary
This paper aims to demonstrate the anarchist
ideal nickname without the impossible utopia has always been considered by the
history books poorly designed and popularized by politicians and intellectuals,
bourgeois, fascist and Marxist, hoping to question this ideal impose their
ideologies. The concept of anarchism is already working on several
academic research, which recovers its features and principles, which is a work
of historical rescue, not only to refer to the facts, but rescue ideas are the
result of human development and social improvement.
I intend to demonstrate these ideas through the
authors see more influence on the formation of the anarchist ideal and
solutions to the problems of political philosophy.
Present anarchist ideals through the literature
of the most libertarians theoretical expression, and through this work show
that the contemporary ideal and added to the solution of human problems and the
format of a better society designed .
Keywords: anarchism, freedom of
social organization,
This work demonstrates the concern of anarchist
thinkers and intellectuals who have developed an important job to think of a
social ideal that really communicates with the reality of the social partners
and can offer better living conditions of people in a movement towards equality
and social justice. An ideal that proposes a dialogue with the reality of
life and has made its facilities, and that will always serve society in the
rightness of their needs and desires.
The political question is not a new problem to
be analyzed by the philosophy, this concern has a similar history to the
history of human civilization, but the concepts are viewed through the prism of
the philosophy of the questions of various thinkers and intellectuals during
The history.
Looking for that through the work of theorists
anarchists like Bakunin, Proudhon and Kropotikin, expose the political ideas of
philosophical anarchism and its main features and proposals. They agree in
the dialogue between the concepts of these authors in order to facilitate
understanding of how anarchism was perpetrated by anarchist theoretical ideal
and the ideal assumptions that were made.
To begin this work presents the ideas of
Proudhon and his critique of political economy and social relations that
contradict the principles of equality, where the philosopher is to write their
proposals against the political system of his time and write their proposals.
What is Property? So with this question
Proudhon begins his thesis, the issue raised by the philosopher is a bit
disconcerting in its formation, but the answer he gives is unusual for many
people. The property is theft Proudhon says, but a steal and even more
surprising is the comparison that the owner is a criminal because the analogy
made by the thinker, where slavery is compared to a property of a murder and
robbery, both considered (murder, theft) crimes under state law.
Proudhon makes a distinction between ownership
and possession, possession is a right common to all the property is that it is
an irregularity, society as a whole and an agreement between the same owner who
leases his property and charge the tenant a percentage of production shows the
imbalance and the irregularity is not clear. How can those who do not work
for the benefit of the production of another, regardless of the support of
church and state and have the right to claim a share of that profit, while
holding a heavy burden on the employee status of taxes, tithes and other terms
and confiscation.
"The work of civilization, which
gives his work a piece of bread, which builds a house to sleep in a barn, which
makes the richest fabrics to use rags, which produces everything you give up
everything that is not free. There associated with the change of their salary
and service, the employer for whom work is their enemy "(Proudhon What Is
Property?, 1975, p.116)
The social organization should be free so as to
guarantee equality of the means of production and other benefits that a group
of persons may provide should be divided as fairly as possible and the
difference between people who should not exist, the support for his genius of
liberty for men to redefine their habits and moral conduct, no discrepancies
offered by private property and economic privileges it provides.
The owner not only appropriates the work
product that actually generates value as required and specified time to rectify
their usury.
The custom and the laws are not guided by
justice, but in consideration of the defense of property, which the company
uses for its logic and its principles, and unfair practices. By insisting
on justice thinker is based on equal irrevocable, not just the playing field
for action at the same time the same.Reason and logic that defines complex
Proudhon ultimately the fact that the right to profit is in other words, the
law of theft, confiscation and misappropriation of effort and work of others.
The property uses the result of work of usury
and not necessity, and the employee exhausts their progress impossible, what
defines a society based on ownership as impossible when it comes to justice and
equality. "Property is impossible, equality is not there.
The first is the hate and would destroy it: the second absorbs all our thoughts
and did not realize "(Proudhon, ditto, 1975, p.195).
In order to establish equal rights and duties
of liberty must be the starting point of social convergence, freedom must be
the foundation of society is not the property. Distinction between
Proudhon's property and can demonstrate their understanding of land use, land
must be of those who produce, as well as factories and production facilities to
make use of them, and exalt the company and its results . The present
owner is a strange and somewhat surreal abstraction of the production process.
The essence of social organization is freedom,
and the only way to ensure equality of social justice and make equitable
relations between social institutions and allow fair trade between urban and
agricultural workers.
The possession must be individual, says
Proudhon, which makes it illegal action that the property itself all changes in
the economic relations of society, making it a fairer distribution of land and
housing, giving all equally the right to occupy different depending on the
number of occupants in an attempt to prevent the property, work becomes a duty
of employment and the result of the work force becomes the collective property.
In conclusion, the play ends with the
ownership and exploitation of man by man. Business transactions must be
made to the extent of change of product by product, avoiding a disproportionate
income trading, any changes must be freely and equally among the parties,
taking into account these conditions, the disparity between rich and poor left
to exist and problems like food shortages will be a thing of the past. The
man just does not produce or even to satisfy all your needs, but exceeds the
economic needs of the group.
Through free association and mutual cooperation
with the maintenance of equal rights and duties to preserve individual freedom
is, in fact, the only way to promote a just and egalitarian society.
According to Proudhon,
" IX. - Freedom of
association, freedom is limited to maintain equality in the means of production
and equity in trade is the only possible form of society, the only just, the
only true
X, - Politics is the science of freedom: the
rule of man by man, whatever the name is assigned, the oppression, the highest
perfection of society is the union of order and anarchy. "( Proudhon, ibid, 1975, p.
247)
There is no possibility of justice in a society
where the economic base is the property and the inequality produced by this
type of economy that generates poverty and wealth in direct proportion, the
government of the few over the other is maintained by its action state's
violent and institutions. The social organization should be guided by a
policy of freedom and equality that will lead to social justice, the pursuit of
a perfect society is based on supporting the merger between order and anarchy.
To help in understanding the physiology of the
proposed organization by anarchist theorists analyze the proposals of Bakunin.
The ideas of Bakunin opposed the establishment
of a centralized power and fragmentation of the revolutionary organizations, so
the idea at once contradictory, innovative, his proposal includes a dialectic
of the organization, which would be the embryo of federalism libertarian
collectivism Bakunin does not propose an organizational model, but notes that
the revolutionary organization must be made by social alliances in a wide and
open as well as in regional and international macro.
"It is the privilege and of every
privileged position to kill the spirit and heart of men. (..) This is a social
law which admits of no exception, and applies to both classes and all nations,
businesses and individuals. And the law of equality, the supreme condition of
freedom and humanity. "(God and the State, Bakunin, p. 25)
The company can develop fully only through
collective effort and the maintenance of equality and freedom.
For freedom, in fact, was established in
society is necessary that the means of production and different sectors of
society are incubated by the members directly, through workers' associations in
the field or whether urban or different industry sectors is necessary to the
economy and maintaining appropriate services to meet the needs of society.
Society must be organized so that all
individuals should have guaranteed funds for maintenance and development, both
for work and for their individual needs for the full development of their
intellectual and physical faculties. The concern with the formation of management
groups so that there is once again exploiting the labor of others and the
economic privileges of the groups who enjoy the social wealth without
participating directly in the production of that wealth.
Let the earth are those who cultivate the land
and the factories of those working in factories, this is the configuration of
the economic plan proposed by Bakunin, a process of self-management in
factories and rural associations.
What differentiates the main point of Bakunin's
collectivism is the availability of goods and wealth produced by workers in the
field or whether they are urban, all members of society, demanding the
attention of the social needs of individuals from childhood regardless of sex
or age, all individuals should have their needs are guaranteed from birth. However,
it provides each member of society able to develop and implement productive
work, to help (depending on capacity), the maintenance needs of the community. The
all collectivist maxim is that all-encompassing and the duty of all, the
exploitation of labor of others is unacceptable in view of collectivism.
The need for a radical change in the economic
and social situation, so it is a true emancipation of the workers are subjected
to slavery by the capitalist system. The relationship between employer and
employee master and slave must be extinguished permanently, in all its forms
and settings that emerged during the history of civilizations. Political
power is causing effect of these inequalities, maintenance and defense of the ruling
classes and provide the privileges of the groups that are established in power,
must be away from society. Only then can society truly moving towards
socialism.
According to the understanding of Bakunin, so
people can actually be emancipated and free final state, it is necessary to
acquire knowledge through education.
Equality "(..) media development, ie,
food, education and education in all forms of science believe that this will
result in economic and social equality only in principle, had become too
intellectual, so removing all inequalities (..)" Bakunin fictitious aput,
Valverde, p.65)
Bakunin Education is not just a simple
understanding of democracy and knowledge acquired by mankind throughout
history, education is the person providing full full full understanding of how
it should be within the body politic, and be able manage their own lives and
make their decisions according to their preferences. Education should be
complete in regard to the intellectual and individual values and culture.
Do not make uninformed decisions, and not be
shared without education options. Knowledge is a releasing agent Bakunin,
which gives the holder the exercise of their freedom conditions in full.
Within this perspective there is a proposal
that through education, there may be a change in the consciousness of the
workers, giving people tools to carry out a socio-cultural revolution.
"(...) We repudiate the false legacy of
virtue, honor and rights, as well as fortune. The heir of any form is no longer
the son of his works, and to the point of departure is a privilege .
The abolition of inheritance rights is
fundamental to the abolition of social classes, whenever there is a group that
owns and transmits to her children, the division between a propertied class and
the class will remain the disinherited.
The elimination of the division between mental
and manual Another economic transformation is the elimination of the division
between mental and manual labor. The intellectual work, which is
appropriated by the capitalist privileged "(...) includes the sciences,
the arts, the conception, design, invention, the calculation, the government and
the general direction of the forces or subordinate workers . "(Bakunin,
1999, p. 99. Aput, collectivist anarchism, 2005.)"
<http://pt.scribd.com/doc/22741378/O-Bakuninismo-Anarquismo-Coletivista>
To the extent that people can understand their
role in society and its true state within a system based on the exploitation of
labor and the unfair distribution of consumer goods and wealth produced by
society, anarchists like Bakunin believed the change in values cause a real
and profound social revolution.
The belief in change driven by the awareness of
people and the positive desire of people to do the best for themselves and
their peers is a hallmark of libertarian collectivism of Bakunin, in rejecting
any form of guidance or intellectual leadership that will rather than
revolution.
The principle of indoctrination is not explicit
in the proposals of Bakunin, but the other is his belief in human nature and
conspiring to evolve a better and fairer society, the belief that Bakunin
expressed in his writings largely draws performance by the fronts of the
revolution and the environment of great change and scientific discovery, pierce
the veil of Maya society in which he had lived for centuries.
It is this dialectic that Bakunin supported the
proposal of federalism collectivist, with great optimism and faith in the
goodness of people and change through education.
"The Alliance declares itself atheist, who
wants the abolition of classes and the political, economic and social full and
equal individuals of both sexes, which wants the land, tools and any other
capital, becoming collective property of society, can only be used by workers,
ie, agricultural and industrial associations. Acknowledges that all government
policies that are currently restricted to administrative functions increasingly
easy for the public services in their countries, will disappear in the
universal union of free associations, both agricultural and industrial. "
(Bakunin, Guillaume James)
<http://pt.scribd.com/doc/61338471/Bakunin-James-Guillaume>
What is the main factor of Bakunin suggests
that there may be a social revolution is a change in the state of affairs not
only in economic or social policy, but a change in social values and social
relations in economic terms, a radical change in society a deep revolution in
society.
Through the philosophy and the various currents
of thought and research methods, we intend to explore and investigate different
ways of knowing and how to understand and present the things according to our
knowledge in the pursuit of accurate knowledge, tested and approved most
closely approximates the true philosophical knowledge.
The way how this knowledge is disseminated and
promoted in society is that it has a simple search versa inference of knowledge
and much closer to the interests of groups that support the economic and
political privileges and access privileges and prerogatives of science
communication and information.
Far from the knowledge produced by a company so
far with the kind of philosophy and interests well to keep the political power
of professional groups to serve the economic power elite, which has the
scientific and philosophical research, largely the suitability of these
economic and political oligarchies.
The political philosophical paradigms, during
the history of civilizations, follow this pattern of submission ruling oligarchies
with few exceptions, which are rejected when they are produced or commonly
labeled subversive insurgency or uprising.
Anarchism is one of those exceptions, which is
not a political philosophical thought to the power and the maintenance or the
prerogatives of the oligarchy, but has committed to a radical change in society
in order to improve human relations and seek a better understanding between
individuals who intend to live in society.
And this issue worth mentioning is the work of
a Russian named Pyotr Kropotikin thinker, who will serve in their proposals to
demonstrate the difficulties of a format of their philosophical and political
changes in society effectively as motivation class interests as an obstacle in
the configuration of political philosophy that focuses on finding the best way
to live in society in a fair and equitable solidarity is not a convenience but
a culture.
Considerations Kropotkin begins by referring to
the change that has the human society in the process of civilization of their
experiences in the caves of the modern age, which aims mainly to its conduct in
relation to the accumulation of property and inheritance.
If any part in the advancement of civilization
is the history of humanity as a whole and the common efforts of all the
benefits and the rules and provided there is only a small part of society? It
makes no sense that no one can deny the achievements of all, given certain
powers and almost anything that is served.
Immoral invention of private property that
allows social groups to appropriate the wealth produced by others to you. What
Proudhon called theft is occurring in modern society, with the approval and
ratification by the laws of the State where the worker is not the product of
their work is delivered to the chief, who somehow took the place of the feudal
lord and is dedicated to providing maintenance and guarantee the rights of the
employing class and the holders of economic power is capitalism. .
"It happened all that enables man to
produce and add to its productive forces was embezzled by some. The ground,
which derives its value accurately the needs of a growing population, which now
belongs to a minority that can prevent and avoid people to work it or prevent
it are grown according to modern needs. (Kropotkin, 1956, p. 6.) "
The means of production workers retired and
everything began to have an owner, and can not survive without being subjected
to exploitation and sale of its own work force peasant and urban worker is
subject to produce for the enrichment of the elites holder of the economic
logic does not apply to capitalist practice, as it only causes to advance the
accumulation of wealth and income of the owners and not for the economic needs
of society. What commitments, much of the "health" of the
economic system.
What happens is that because the system is
marked on the product of usury and profit of a few, can not occur with any real
capacity, the existence of the army of unemployed workers productive and
greatly overloads the great number of intermediaries that do not produce more
than the benefits of trade in goods labor of others, the production process is
fraught with the treatment given to improve the product of the "law of
demand" if a product has no value more to the machinations of the capitalist
system, the bottleneck in production causes a shortage of the product that is
valued in the market. The system based on the steady increase in profits
is not an economic system is quite cannibalistic self-consumption.
The proposal being for all, made by anarchism,
it is possible that all these thousands of parasites are no longer just a
social nuisance and begin to contribute their work and the owners no longer own
the wealth produced by the trabajadores.Promover equal status and welfare for
all is possible.
What is Kropotkin says: "The
welfare for all, not a dream. It is possible, achievable, after which our
ancestors made fruitful by our workforce. (Kropotkin, 1956, p. 7)"
What is expected of the revolution is not a
representative of change, but having the means of production and consumer goods
for the people and for the people. They take all the wealth gives people
know what is welfare, and how to live in abundance is known as the hard work
and a shortage of what you want and need.
As anarchists imagine the possibility of an
egalitarian society and economically viable in the form of welfare for all? This
is certainly an important question to be clarified, and Kropotkin and other
anarchist theorists present us several proposals, including anarcho-communism that
is precisely the proposal of Kropotkin. Like : Any company
that breaks the private property will be seen in the case of the organization
in libertarian communism. (Kropotkin, idem, p. 11)
"
In a society where all means of production,
showing a total change in the format of the work and activities and working
relationships, the distribution of products of this work also has to undergo a
radical change, not with a form mild state of communism (Marxism), but that's
all I have all the material world.The end of the property brings this change in
proportion, without the owners have each other only for the possession of what
you need for your welfare and not work or pay for the bonuses they receive, but
have wealth and labor is also common wealth should be.
Anarchism does not endorse the concept that
appears backward in the idea of "state management," sovereign in the
maintenance of social welfare and economic security of the society, the
ideological myth is not reflected in reality, most of the productive activities
society are dissociated state management, state interference in economic
activities to the greater possibility of failure and failure. Briefly
state action interferes with the production process and not only the seizure as
a provider and administrator. The processes required to secure a new
economic organization which to do justice to this science, to understand human
needs and promote the means to address them, are hard and difficult, does not
change the social structure so that radical changes and reforms of simple , is
like using a new cloth to repair clothing routes, eventually everything breaks
again rise after the old system and take ownership of the means of production
is necessary to integrate the work and actions that make a real connection between
field workers and city workers can be through free trade associations of food
for the urban life of the manufactured products of interest to farmers, all
that is heavy and does not capture regulated is that you have little
restriction .
This means the economic changes suggest about
the economy does not mean normalizing economic relations, but the associations
did not know how they can contribute to the maintenance of society and how it
can make better use of community wealth, without making the necessary laws and
penalties for task performance and good use of the wealth produced by the
community. Practices should die with the bourgeois capitalist system, a
new society requires effort and will of all, the certainty of establishing the
best for everyone.
"(..) Communism is not the phalanstery or
authoritarian German theorists, but the anarchist communism, communism without
government, of free men. This is the synthesis of the two objectives pursued by
mankind through the ages :. Economic freedom and political freedom
"(Kropotkin, ibid, p. 2)"
In order to promote a caring society where
freedom and respect for people is a common practice, to elucidate the positive
actions everyday problems will be reinforced by the desire to improve society
and move toward greater.
No empty symbolism and ideologies of the true
purposes, but more on relationships and respect for rights, equality is nothing
but a dead letter in inadequate legislation, but to consolidate all day in the
relations practice labor and solidarity in an anarchist society.
Conclusion
Anarchism is a political philosophy based on
not accepting any kind of power and hierarchy, as a mode of social
organization. With the actions and methods of organization guided by the
free and independent organization and voluntary initiative.
What can we conclude with the proposals of
thinkers and theorists have seen so far through this is what our work will be
displayed below.
For the format of an anarchic society is needed
and complete a radical change in the status quo, ie a social revolution. How
can you establish an anarchist society is a question that has different views,
whose proposals have given rise to many philosophical currents of political
thought.
Anarchism proposes solutions to the problems of
injustice, inequality and authoritarianism and baptized into the idea of
freedom and equal rights for all.By rejecting any form of power and
domination that provides the possibility of a higher form of human
organization, without universal suffrage, without the dictatorship or fascism. Denying
the alleged need for leaders or leaders who are leading people and represent
their concerns to drive the lives of all.
Anarchism advocates that all are able to go
their own way, which respects the right of all and understood as a duty of
solidarity and respect necessary for the maintenance of the common good, when
the rights of each are always chosen so autonomously, without subordination to
any authority established or institutionalized norm suppress the will of the
person and his inalienable right to be free.
The principle of indoctrination is not one of
the concepts that differ from the ideologies of anarchism in general, not an
anarchist doctrine proposes, but suggestions of how they are organized on the
basis of certain principles of individual liberty, universal equality and
justice social. Anarchism is an ideology, because it does not establish
the doctrine that undermines the social reality in a world view based on
dogmatic views of its creators.
As unorthodox thinking is no limit to
understanding the world and the way it presents, anarchism is not limited to an
absolute interpretation of reality, to put his ideas into an ideology, not
reality is fixed but it is understood, the reality is that heterodox proposals
of how to organize society can only develop in heterodox. Respecting the
principles of equality, freedom and social justice.
Each individual social should be able to
understand its social function, responsible for building your own reason and
values, the individual's participation not only in the production of consumer
goods, but also in building the intellectual society, habits , culture, ethics
and moral values. Everyone should have the intellectual tools that provide
value judgments about reality participating auto sea and freedom to be whole.
If we are really the result of our decisions
can only be truly free if it is to implement the decisions we make,
individually and without the deduction of the charges made by the social
conventions that are made before the person was born.
Freedom of choice increases the very condition
of being as a social individual, understanding that equality is consolidated in
the comparison of different and not the similarity, but the difference of each
individual and mutual solidarity and help to promote the construction of an
egalitarian society. Because it is in the performance of our differences
that we become a true equality.
Any form of government is seen by anarchists as
authoritarian and illegitimate, as it only serves to perpetuate the domination
and exploitation of man by man, and maintains the prerogatives of the ruling
elite at the expense of the rest of the population. Organizational policy
also called libertarian socialism, anarchism, where the existence of a
government manager is not allowed even a transition system, which has been
defended by authoritarian socialist lines saying that only after an interim
administration of a state workers could reach the conditions for socialist
change in effect. Suddenly, this ideology is not consistent with the
ideals of libertarian socialism, because freedom can not be exercised through
the use of coercion, violence, a legal status established, you can only
exercise their freedom in the actual practice of freedom not socialize by
decree, but a part of all socialize.
Social organization is the free way and without
the application of rules and standards, consumer goods and are socialized
property, on the understanding that all work that everyone is entitled to enjoy
consumer goods produced in society. Without this act to the need for
regulatory authorities or any kind of leadership or government organizations at
all levels of society must be made freely, and which consists of discarded
must, without unnecessary alleged obligations and restrictions the good life
and the maintenance of social welfare. The sole purpose of ensuring full
freedom of choice socais agents, both in the way they joined.
Libertarian socialism is its functionality
completely linked to the absence of central authority or any of its
manifestations, bureaucratic or absolute, arguing for a form of organization
based on free enterprise and self management. What did the actual exercise
of individual liberty and equal justice for all social beings.
Social divisions are negative for the formation
of a just and egalitarian society, which creates conflicts unfit for society
and the inconsistencies of the community and provides a joint action, which
makes available any social division. Everyone should be understood as
moral equivalents are, of course, without this being considered for their
spatial or genetic characteristics important.
The formation of each individual that can be
influenced according to the cultural universe in which is inserted, which makes
the geographic factor, but the company with whom he lives, every civilization
is a society that chooses as the constitution required its history.
The inherently global nature of the anarchist
ideas of political philosophy is totally different and not based on capitalist
or imperialist interests, with a global vision without the imposition of
political boundaries, commercial or any kind of ideology, ruling out any
voltage disputes over territory or commercial benefit, anarchism proposes
comprehensive globalization, where everything is shared by all, not just some,
or privileges of certain countries that have commercial and industrial
structures and monopoly privileges and maintain the advantage in international
trade relations.
Dissemination of knowledge and access to
information for all is something advocated by anarchists as essential for the
training of people can form their own concepts and making judgments about the
actions and things within the social environment, becoming self-sufficient in
managing their lives. For this proposal is accepted by the anarchist idea
of libertarian education and holistic education.
Breaking the chain anarchism domination
disrupted the architecture of power and division of classes, the class of the
rich and the priests, spiritual leaders and politicians have no place in an
anarchist society.
Codes of conduct has always insisted on
punishments are discarded by the anarchist ideal, since their functionality is
not reflected in the experimental reality, but has always been used to favor
the ruling class and to encourage mediation of disputes or establish facto
equality.
The libertarian federalism goes beyond the
condition of the business meeting or city council of the Connector
configuration of a network of solidarity which helps in communication and
mutual support of various groups that make up the federación.Hay therefore a
representative of the groups and their interests, but participating in the
personal needs of every member of society, which distinguishes him as unique in
the political power of the Union ordered to meet the social needs of the
individual.
The environment of the organization is defined
by the natural dynamics of everyday life, as the participation of all,
naturally, brings this action and potency of these changes. The meanings
of the former organization are considered incentives that complement each other
through the dialectical libertarian federation.
Individual responsibility is inherent in all
actions managed by the individual and not assigned to any concept of abstract
moral behavior, but a concrete and objective self-awareness and values that
govern the actions of each individual.
In terms of the collective rights appears
general interest perspective, compared to individual desire. That's not
true interest will converge to the individual to the extent that this is an
active player in the community and is reflected in social action, cooperative,
association or social group that arises from the execution of any collective
action . Where the individual is struggling to overcome the difficulties
facing the community, which also benefited on a personal level.
As in the individual actions of the emerging
groups are the sole responsibility of these groups, primarily the result is
your responsibility to project settings and the consequences are entirely your
responsibility.
The functionality of social groups should be
done in an organized way and with maximum effort so that everyone can
contribute his share of work without being overloaded, the contribution must be
so far from each according to his ability.
Concern for the formation of a social policy
view that has the ability to dialogue with the collective moral and social
needs in its various aspects, economic, organizational and political debate is
an extremely difficult task, due to the circumstances of civilization and its
implications.
What anarchism proposes a large extent, is a
collective action to change the values revered for centuries, revolutionizing
thinking and social behavior in which individuals are aware of the need for
this change and then we want the change. Thinking that is based on social
justice, equal rights and collective responsibility, and as a new paradigm of
equal liberty and solidarity.
The search for anarchism is really a
revolution, a profound change in all social ethical, political, economic y. For
harmonization, freedom, equality, peace and solidarity.
Centro Universitario Claretiano.El anarquismo como una propuesta de hoy
Santos, Paulo Rogério Sousa
Santo André /2011
Referências bibliográficas
Anarquismo coletivista - O
bakuninismo. Coletivo pró organização anarquista em Goiás .GO – 2005.
Disponível em: <http://pt.scribd.com/doc/22741378/O-Bakuninismo-Anarquismo-Coletivista>
Acessado em : 06-05-2011
Bakunin, Mikhail. Federalismo,
Socialismo e Antiteologismo. Cortez editora. SP. 1988.
Mikhail Bakunin. Deus e o Estado.
São Paulo: Imaginário, 2000.
Bakunin , M.A. Deus e o Estado.-
Educação Integral. Textos Anarquistas - 1874
Bakunin, M.A., O sistema
Capitalista. Disponível em:
<http://struggle.ws/anarchists/bakunin/writings/capitalist_system.html>.
Acessado em: 02-04-2011
Bakunin,
M.A.http://flag.blackened.net/daver/anarchism/bakunin/bakunin3.html
Bakunin, Mikhail. A Igreja e o
Estado. Disponível em: www.ateus.net
Bakunin, Anarquismo Coletivista -
O Bakuninismo. Disponível em:
<
http://www.anarkismo.net/newswire.php?story_id=2215> Acessado em: 10-04-2011
Gramsci, Antonio. Os Intelectuais
e a Organização da Cultura. Editora Civilização Brasileira S.A. RJ. 1982.
Guillaume, James. Bakunin.
Disponível em:
<http://pt.scribd.com/doc/61338471/Bakunin-James-Guillaume>) Acessado em:
02-04-2011
Kropotkin Piotr. A Conquista do
Pão. Ed. Organizações Simões. Rio de Janeiro. 1956
Kropotkin Piotr. O Apoio Mútuo.
2006. Disponível em :
<http://pt.scribd.com/doc/19944850/O-Apoio-Mutuo-Piotr-Kropotkin->
Acessado em: 02-04-2011
Jomini, Regina Célia
MazoniUniversidade Uma educação para a solidariedade : contribuição ao estudo
das concepções e realizações educacionais dos anarquistas na Republica
Velha.Unicamp. Faculdade de Educação 2007
Malatesta, Enrrico. Escritos
Revolucionários. São Paulo: Imaginário. 1989
Montarroyos, Heraldo Elias de
Moura .A anarquia ordenada e suas regras de decisão: uma concepção da
emergência da cooperação social. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências
Humanas (FFLCH).2008.
Nascimento, Rogério Humberto
Zeferino. Experimentos libertários e emergência de saberes anarquistas no
Brasil .PUC .São Paulo.2006
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon.O que é a
propriedade?. Editorial Estampa Lisboa.1975.
Romera Valverde, Antônio José.
Pedagogia Libertária e Autodidatismo. UNICAMP. Campinas. SP 1996.
Rodrigues, Edgar. Os libertários.
VJR Editores. RJ.1993.
Rodrigues, Edgar. Pensadores
Anarquista e Militantes libertários. Arquivo de História pessoal Edgar
Rodrigues.Ebooksbrasil.2000. Disponível em:
<http://www.ceca.org.br/edgar/anarkp.html>. Acessado em: 02-05-2011
Silvio ,Donizetti de Oliveira
Gallo.Anarquismo e anarquistas, Educação e Estado, Política e educação.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas . Faculdade de Educação.1993
Silvia Ingrid Lang Magnani .O
movimento anarquista em São Paulo : (1906-1917). Universidade Estadual de Campinas . Faculdade
de Educação. 1979
Valverde, Antonio José Romera.
Pedagogia Libertária e Autodidatismo. SP. Unicamp. 1996.
